Channel Nine spruiks QLink

Or, at least, Today's "technology editor" Charlie Brown.

As with Stephen Fenech, I've contacted Charlie Brown via Twitter asking for justification of his sales pitch.

So far, not a peep.

I'm told that Stephen and Charlie are good buddies. Not that I want to suggest collusion, but let's face it, I'm suggesting collusion. Are you being paid for this Charlie? In cash or in kind, either way is a problem for journalistic ethics. If you're not being paid, then you're clearly too gullible to be a technology reporter. If you are being paid, then you're clearly unqualified to be a reporter of any kind.

I can't think of another reason. gullibility or cash?

I have, of course, Sidewiki'd Charlie's site.

Last for this post, Skeptics With A K episode 34 takes on a British "phone shield" product. Check out the podcast for more detail.

UPDATE 2:46pm 8/11 Charlie Brown has responded at his blog
«November»
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
31123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829301234
567891011
 
Vaccination Saves Lives: Stop The Australian Vaccination Network
 
 
Say NO to the National School Chaplaincy Program